Electrogravitics – A simplified description

Electrogravitics... This technology, in which the separation of positive charges from negative charges produced a movement of that which was between the charged plates towards the positive plate, was being developed and tested in all major aerospace companies in the 1950's. Martin, Convair, Lear, Sperry, Raytheon, and many others all were eagerly studying electrogravitics. But in 1959 or early 1960, the technology became highly classified and the path to energy abundance was stymied. Here is a basic description of how electrogravitics functions:

First, One has to understand that the model offered by Einstein is flawed... There are other models. There is one in particular...

The model, which I say is a far better one than relativity, is subquantum kinetics (SQK). Its developer, Dr. Paul A. LaViolette (an interesting character, to say the least), started with chemical kinetics (as above, so below?) and came up with SQK, being very concerned by its gravitational predictions. He had not heard of the Biefeld-Brown Effect, nor the work of T. Townsend Brown. He struggled with these predictions until He encountered Brown's work, discovering that SQK predicted exactly what Brown was showing experimentally.

Why is SQK better than relativity?

It takes no element on faith: Einstein's relativity is based on the faith that matter somehow "bends" space-time. Nowhere does He explain (or even try to) HOW or WHY this might be. One just has to take it on faith.

It explains things without the need for "renormalization;" relativity ends in infinities without this mathematical fudge.

It integrates EM with gravity. Einstein Himself died still trying to do so.

And it still predicts things like the lensing of light, the apparent time dilation, and all other predictions of relativity, plus more - all of which are testable (string theory is 100% untestable).

In fact, many of the mysteries of Einsteinian mathematics are predicted in SQK.

I recommend reading a book called Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion, by Dr. LaViolette, for more on the Biefeld-Brown Effect, Brown's work, electrogravitics, SQK, and more.

In SQK, positively charged particles have a positive gravity potential "well." (Positive particles have positive gravity.) Negatively charged particles have a negative gravity potential "hill." (Negative particles have negative gravity.) The positive particle's "well" is just the smallest fraction bigger than the negative "hill," accounting for the apparent weakness of gravity, where essentially even amounts of positively charged and negatively charged particles make up common matter, and in quantities as big as the earth, say, offer a slight "well" overall, thus explaining why We are aware of gravity at all.

The Biefeld-Brown Effect was discovered when it was noted that a dielectric with electrodes attached at either end, would apparently lose weight when charged if the positive pole was pointed upwards on a scale, and apparently gain weight when reversed, when placed on a scale. It was soon discovered that it was not a weight loss, but a movement in the direction of the positive pole. Higher voltage increased this effect.

Further study showed that the higher the K of the dielectric, the more pronounced the movements became. Asymmetrical electrodes contribute to the increase of the effect, as well. Also, a non-linear dielectric produced greater movement than a linear one. With high K, non-linear dielectrics, a substantial force could be observed, even to the point of levitation with a local gravity field induced.

And so, positive particles have positive gravity, and negative particles have negative gravity; by separating positive from negative (via voltage applied), a gravity field is created, wherein the contents "fall" in the direction of the positive charge with force greater than the energy fed to separate the charged particles.

If, say, four devices were placed on a cross, each oriented 90° to the center and pointing in the same direction relative to that center, and a shaft was set at center and into a generator, when small amounts of energy are used at high voltage on the units, the resulting rotation will induce a greater output at the generator than the input to the units. Overunity (as energy is drawn from the zero point field) is achieved.

A petition for the release of electrogravitics from black projects has been started; please sign this petition and spread the information. If We can reach the tipping point of awareness, We can demand this technology:

http://www.change.org/petitions/us-military-release-the-technology-of-electrogravitics

Twitter: @AmaterasuSolar

by Amaterasu Solar

Comments

Carolyn Rose 1 year ago

Electro-gravitics? made simple? Really? I feel like a real dummy! Is it anti-gravity like the way UFOs move at all angles?

Carolyn Rose (@Carolyn Rose) 1 year ago

Amaterasu, thanks for taking time to answer. Wow, just hard to wrap the brain around!. I rememember this guy explaining how they used reverse technology to discover how UfO's use gravity control to guide their ships. He claimed he had worked at area 51. He claimed they used an element known as 115. Anyway, glad I got it a little. Carolyn

Amaterasu Solar (@Carolyn Rose) 1 year ago

Sounds like You're talking Bob Lazar. I'm on the fence about Him. The basic idea here is that between two diodes, a gravity field is established. There are many things One can do to make this more pronounced - like have a small negative plate and a larger positive plate - but the basic concept is sound.

Amaterasu Solar (@Carolyn Rose) 1 year ago

Yes. Well, technically, it is gravity control. And free energy.

Amaterasu Solar 1 year ago

The petition is not there with any expectation it will be heeded - though if so, that would be awesome. It is a tool to raise awareness, give a sense of camaraderie, offer a link to share, allow voices to be heard, and pass on information. I admit to struggling to grasp the thrust of Your post... Maybe a straightforward approach would make it easier to comb through?

Magnus Regnant (@Amaterasu Solar) 1 year ago

Any straightforward approaches may be found via previous proffers via the links provided. Intelligence with inclusive wisdom, is indicative thereof, appertaining to the exercise of the Science of Right Reason. As for those exercising the Science of Right Reason, whomever they may be, know beyond any reasonable doubt, that anti-gravitic engineering sciences specifically, has existed on planet Earth for many moons brethren. (see: http://www.searlsolution.com/technology3.html). The explanations provided via Amaterasu Solar, is worthy of consideration, for those studious enough to explore the particular engineering sciences surrounding anti-gravitic usages. As for anyone struggling to grasp our associated commentary thrust, should avail themselves of the sufficient comb of time, to garner through, what is provided via any web links for those wishing to seek further perfecting their conditions, governed by the Science of Right Reason respective thereto. As I have stated, we are not here to dissuade any individuals from pursuits exercising the Science of Right Reason in Good Will, in the interest of seeking Universal Peace with All Walks of Life. Until then, I AM... Most graciously 'In Honor We Trust,' Magnus Regnant of the Sovereign Earth Alliance NOTICE: U.P.C. Applicable.

Magnus Regnant 1 year ago

After reviewing the plethora of writings and ideology of Amaterasu Solar, we find nothing new in any approach therein, or thereby, appertaining to social paradigms proffered. Excepting, if one chooses to ignore these facts...that to continue along these lines of asking anyone in authority to do anything contrary to their "Oaths of Office," is tantamount to interfering in the internal affairs of the sovereignty of another State and or Social Compact however known. As it appears to be suggested via such devices known as 'Petitions,' by those not party thereto. Please consider for your own health and general welfare, that the ability to state a claim for which relief must be granted, arises necessarily from the standpoint of the duty anyone owes in respect thereto. And, as it relates to so-called 'Petitions,' the general 'Public-At-Large' lacks any standing to state such claims via instruments however entitled, respecting what others may deem as a duty applicable to respond in kind thereto. Unless those in authority have some ulterior need to be overgenerous! To prove this empirical fact, if it is reasonable to presume such is the case, appertaining to those proffering such actions having or wishing to acquire standing, have at the same time, a justifiable means of establishing verifiable facts touching upon anyone's duty and/or the responsibilities to respond via variation by agreement, which presumably exists between any party in interest and any party of interest, respectively to any so-called 'Petition,' that any may claim via a 'operation in law' to require anyone exercising authority, to act upon via a 'operation of law,' respectfully. Lacking the aforementioned facts or means, most certainly will reduce the reasonable outcome presumed, by any so-called petitioner related to any 'Petition.' And, more than likely, will be considered by those exercising administrative authorities thereof, as rogue elements in any social framework however established. Furthermore, to assist anyone presumably exercising the Science of Right Reason, failing to observe such Universal Principles, is tantamount to orchestrating claims upon any presumed debt (duty) owed, as presumed by whomever herein! Whether Private or Public petitioners, appertaining to questioning those exercising any provable authority, absent variation by agreement to state otherwise. In conclusion, to counsel those acting in any manner, which tends to question either the Science of Right Reason in any behavior specific to any 'Petitioner' or otherwise, it is necessary to proffer empirical evidence in support of prudence related thereto. For those seeking Good Will in the interest of Universal Peace with All Walks of Life, we proffer for their edification the 'Concordat Universal Declaration on the Four Freedoms (http://www.seagov.net/charter-and-declarations),' issued out from the auspices of the Sovereign Earth Alliance, which if any are interested in exercising prudence before contemplating petitioning or otherwise, anyone exercising authority of whatever nature, should in the interest of reasonable behavior, consider the facts established, specific to the declaration mentioned. And, more specifically found therein on pages 13-16. Most graciously 'In Honor We Trust,' Magnus Regnant of the Sovereign Earth Allinace NOTICE: U.P.C. Applicable.

Post a new comment

Your name: *

Your email address: *

Comment text: *

The image that appears on your comment is your Gravatar

Share

Back to top ⇑